<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Just Read This To Share With You &#187; book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ijustreadthis.com/tag/book/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ijustreadthis.com</link>
	<description>Gossip of the day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<copyright>admin</copyright>
		<itunes:author>admin</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>Just another WordPress weblog</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		
		<item>
		<title>One Book Review Doesn&#039;t Tell The Whole Tale</title>
		<link>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/one-book-review-doesnt-tell-the-whole-tale.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/one-book-review-doesnt-tell-the-whole-tale.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ijustreadthis.com/one-book-review-doesnt-tell-the-whole-tale.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><!--wsa:Top-Left-250-Float--><span style="font-size: medium;">Book lovers are always on the lookout for a new good read.</span> Sometimes, a recommendation from a trusted friend is all you need. You may also pick up a book based on a good review from a critic you find reliable. However, just as with movies, many book gems go unnoticed by the big name critics and you can miss some great books by not looking a little further.</p>
<p>When reading book reviews, you must also consider the source. Does your favorite critic review books solely based on popularity? Publishers expend huge sums of money to promote books with mass appeal. Granted, these can be excellent books, but so many more are completely under the radar.</p>
<p>One good way to widen your horizons is to search out new books on online bookstore sites. If you favor a particular genre, look in that category. Scroll through some of the many offerings and see what captures your eye. When you request details on a particular book, the bookstore provides reviews from a variety of sources. The publisher&#039;s review is usually listed first. Naturally, the publisher has a vested interest in writing a glowing book review. According to the publishing house reviewer, this book is the best thing since sliced bread. This may or may not be true. The reviewer&#039;s taste may depart from yours. You need to read on for other critic&#039;s opinions.</p>
<p>The Library Journal&#039;s review may differ substantially from the publisher&#039;s. Their book review may be equally favorable, but provide different details on what they found worthy in your prospective choice. This can be helpful and corroborate what the publisher had to say. On the other hand, their review may be curiously unfavorable and at odds with the publisher&#039;s. The reviewer generally backs up negative statements with reasons they took that position. However, it&#039;s all subjective and most book reviews consist largely of opinion. At least you&#039;ve got more information.</p>
<p>You may find one or two additional independent, professional book reviews with useful information and details to guide your choice. Read them all.</p>
<p>The last category of book reviews are those that come from ordinary folk, readers just like you and me. They aren&#039;t being paid to offer their opinions and tend to say they liked or disliked the book in question and give the specific reasons why. These reader reviews generally come right to the point, aren&#039;t elaborate and don&#039;t try to praise or slam a book for ulterior motives. Ironically, reader book reviews can prove most telling of all. You may find that one reader review hits all your hot spots, either positive or negative. Another&#039;s opinion may be so poorly expressed and nonsensical that you may discount that book review entirely.</p>
<p>Following a process that gives you several viewpoints can assure better choices, fewer disappointments and lots of avant garde reading material.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.ijustreadthis.com/one-book-review-doesnt-tell-the-whole-tale.html" class="more-link">More on One Book Review Doesn&#039;t Tell The Whole Tale</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--wsa:Top-Left-250-Float--><span style="font-size: medium;">Book lovers are always on the lookout for a new good read.</span> Sometimes, a recommendation from a trusted friend is all you need. You may also pick up a book based on a good review from a critic you find reliable. However, just as with movies, many book gems go unnoticed by the big name critics and you can miss some great books by not looking a little further.</p>
<p>When reading book reviews, you must also consider the source. Does your favorite critic review books solely based on popularity? Publishers expend huge sums of money to promote books with mass appeal. Granted, these can be excellent books, but so many more are completely under the radar.</p>
<p>One good way to widen your horizons is to search out new books on online bookstore sites. If you favor a particular genre, look in that category. Scroll through some of the many offerings and see what captures your eye. When you request details on a particular book, the bookstore provides reviews from a variety of sources. The publisher&#039;s review is usually listed first. Naturally, the publisher has a vested interest in writing a glowing book review. According to the publishing house reviewer, this book is the best thing since sliced bread. This may or may not be true. The reviewer&#039;s taste may depart from yours. You need to read on for other critic&#039;s opinions.</p>
<p>The Library Journal&#039;s review may differ substantially from the publisher&#039;s. Their book review may be equally favorable, but provide different details on what they found worthy in your prospective choice. This can be helpful and corroborate what the publisher had to say. On the other hand, their review may be curiously unfavorable and at odds with the publisher&#039;s. The reviewer generally backs up negative statements with reasons they took that position. However, it&#039;s all subjective and most book reviews consist largely of opinion. At least you&#039;ve got more information.</p>
<p>You may find one or two additional independent, professional book reviews with useful information and details to guide your choice. Read them all.</p>
<p>The last category of book reviews are those that come from ordinary folk, readers just like you and me. They aren&#039;t being paid to offer their opinions and tend to say they liked or disliked the book in question and give the specific reasons why. These reader reviews generally come right to the point, aren&#039;t elaborate and don&#039;t try to praise or slam a book for ulterior motives. Ironically, reader book reviews can prove most telling of all. You may find that one reader review hits all your hot spots, either positive or negative. Another&#039;s opinion may be so poorly expressed and nonsensical that you may discount that book review entirely.</p>
<p>Following a process that gives you several viewpoints can assure better choices, fewer disappointments and lots of avant garde reading material.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/one-book-review-doesnt-tell-the-whole-tale.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Chinese Poets (1994) Reviewed &#8211; by Vikram Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/three-chinese-poets-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/three-chinese-poets-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vikram Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ijustreadthis.com/three-chinese-poets-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><!--wsa:Top-Left-250-Float-->Seth, who studied classical Chinese poetry at Nanjing University and is fluent in Mandarin, translates the works of the three Tang dynasty poets &#8211; Wang Wei, Li Bai and Du Fu &#8211; and proves with his deft lyricism that it takes an Asian to truly capture the aesthetic of these poets.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.ijustreadthis.com/three-chinese-poets-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html" class="more-link">More on Three Chinese Poets (1994) Reviewed &#8211; by Vikram Seth</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--wsa:Top-Left-250-Float-->Seth, who studied classical Chinese poetry at Nanjing University and is fluent in Mandarin, translates the works of the three Tang dynasty poets &#8211; Wang Wei, Li Bai and Du Fu &#8211; and proves with his deft lyricism that it takes an Asian to truly capture the aesthetic of these poets.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]Vikram Seth,book[/tags]</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/three-chinese-poets-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Suitable Boy (1994) Reviewed &#8211; by Vikram Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/a-suitable-boy-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/a-suitable-boy-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vikram Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ijustreadthis.com/a-suitable-boy-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Set in the fictional provincial town of Brahmpur in India in the 1950s, this lyrical domestic drama tells the story of four Indian families in the years after the partition of the subcontinent into India and Pakistan.&#160; It centres on a mother&#039;s quest to find a son-in-law.&#160; The book won te 1994 Commonwealth WRiters&#039; Prize.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.ijustreadthis.com/a-suitable-boy-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html" class="more-link">More on A Suitable Boy (1994) Reviewed &#8211; by Vikram Seth</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set in the fictional provincial town of Brahmpur in India in the 1950s, this lyrical domestic drama tells the story of four Indian families in the years after the partition of the subcontinent into India and Pakistan.&nbsp; It centres on a mother&#039;s quest to find a son-in-law.&nbsp; The book won te 1994 Commonwealth WRiters&#039; Prize.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=fistansup-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=0060786523&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=000000&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>[tags]Vikram Seth,book[/tags]</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/a-suitable-boy-1994-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Golden Gate (1986) Reviewed &#8211; by Vikram Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/the-golden-gate-1986-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/the-golden-gate-1986-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vikram Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ijustreadthis.com/the-golden-gate-1986-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Golden Gate (1986).</p>
<p>YES, it is written entirely in a tetrameter sonnet form, but Seth&#039;s observant eye captures the idiosyncrasies of a group of friends in Marin County, California, and it deals with contemporary issues such as vegetarianism, feminism and anti-nuclear marches.&#160; It won the Commonwealth Poetry Prize in 1986.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.ijustreadthis.com/the-golden-gate-1986-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html" class="more-link">More on The Golden Gate (1986) Reviewed &#8211; by Vikram Seth</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Golden Gate (1986).</p>
<p>YES, it is written entirely in a tetrameter sonnet form, but Seth&#039;s observant eye captures the idiosyncrasies of a group of friends in Marin County, California, and it deals with contemporary issues such as vegetarianism, feminism and anti-nuclear marches.&nbsp; It won the Commonwealth Poetry Prize in 1986.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=fistansup-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=0679734570&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=000000&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>[tags]Vikram Seth,book[/tags]</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ijustreadthis.com/the-golden-gate-1986-reviewed-by-vikram-seth.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
